One blogger’s personal bridge to nowhere

Boom –> bust

I, unlike George Soros, have a grand total of zero theories to explain financial markets.  Yet even I could probably make the same sort of bold prediction that Soros is making here.

My interpretation of financial markets based on reflexivity can explain events better than it can predict them. It is less ambitious than the previous theory. It does not claim to determine the outcome as equilibrium theory does. It can assert that a boom must eventually lead to a bust, but it cannot determine either the extent or the duration of a boom.

Correct me if I am wrong, but don’t booms practically by definition lead to busts?  If a boom just kept booming, wouldn’t it, I don’t know, explode?  Cleary, Soros’ theory is just further evidence that he is funding a worldwide liberal conspiracy to foment Communist revolutions at home and abroad.

November 23, 2008 - Posted by | Uncategorized

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: